Uusi IPCC-skandaali jota en ole ehtinyt tarkistaa? Äskettäin saamani viesti kertoo, että IPCC:n AR4 WG1 aurinkoa koskeva kannanotto perustuu vain yhteen asiantuntijaan, nimittäi Judith Leaniin:
Subject: [Climate Sceptics] New global warming scandal: ‘Consensus’ on Sun is by one expert
This is the same Judith Lean who co-authored a recent GRL paper with
David Rind about which Martin Livermore wrote, "The study smacks of
damage limitation, of a desire to find some rational explanation for
the lack of temperature rise over the past seven or more years." (see
Gary's post 24 April). Paul Ashton
New Global Warming Scandal: `Consensus' on Sun is by one Expert
June 26, 2010
New global warming data fraud scandal seems to show a faked
`consensus' of the impact of solar forcing on Earth's climate based
on one finding.
A staggering new finding seems to mire the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change (IPCC) in global warming scandal every bit as
devastating as Climategate.
The news broke June 24, 2010 on a Czech climate skeptic blog,
Klimaskeptik.cz, that calls the latest global warming scandal,
Roughly translated into English the site reveals that the The IPCC
relied on evidence supplied by just only one Solar Physicist, Judith
Lean, to create their "consensus that solar influence upon the
climate was minimal.
Judithgate Scandal Goes Viral
The story has going viral on climate skeptic websites and is reported
on a leading blog, `Climate Realists' as ,'IPCC "Consensus" on Solar
Influence was Only One Solar Physicist who Agreed with Her Own
New Global Warming Scandal: Consensus on Sun is One Expert
Apparently, objections were raised to the IPCC by the Norwegian
Government as early as the draft version in the preliminary phases of
the IPCC's draft of their Fourth Report of 2007, which won the
organization the Nobel Peace Prize.
A total of six further peer-reviewed papers were dismissed by the
IPCC for inclusion. At least one of the papers, by leading solar
expert Hans Svensmark totally contradicted the IPCC's conclusions
that the Sun was not a key player in climate change.
Norwegian Government Snubbed By `Politicized' IPCC
Citing evidence from the IPCC's Fourth Report (AR4) second draft
comments objections to the creation of a faked consensus among
scientists was raised by scientitic representatives from the
Norwegian Government which spotted the fraud.
Their noted objection reads: "I would encourage the IPCC to
[re-]consider having only one solar physicist on the lead author team
of such an important chapter. In particular since the conclusion of
this section about solar forcing hangs on one single paper in which
J. Lean is a coauthor. I find that this paper, which certainly can be
correct, is given too much weight."
The IPCC dismissed the objections of the Norwegian government
outright stating that any such changes would be "impractical."
"Scandalous Re-writing" of Climate Data Records
The Czech blog outraged at what it sees as apparent cherry-picking to
fit a pre-determined political view to blame global warming on
man-made emissions of carbon dioxide, fumed, "Judith Lean, along with
Claus Frohlich, are responsible for the scandalous rewriting of
graphs of solar activity."
Backed up by evidence obtained from the Harvard University Library,
it may be proven that satellite measurements between 1986 and 96 do
indicate that Judith Lean and Claus Frohlich (authors of the single
study noted above) "manipulated" their data.
More Woe For Beleagured IPCC Chairman, Pachauri
The article asserts that there was also further deliberate intent
committed by the IPCC to stifle objections raised by other
international climate experts, "People who were in charge of the
satellites and created the original graphs (the world's best
astrophysics: Doug Hoyt, Richard C. Willson), protested in vain
against such manipulation."
The head of the IPCC, Rajendra Pachauri, had already admitted to
similar such "errors" in the Glaciergate scandal but has repeatedly
refused to resign, as reported in the India Times. The UN has been
conducting it's own internal investigations but has not divulged its
findings to the public. http://www.prisonplanet.com/new-global- ... xpert.html
Mikäli tämä on totta, niin IPCC:n aurinkoosuus joutuu hieman kyseenalaiseen valoon.