#DataGate

Ilmastotutkimukseen sekä sitä sivuaviin tutkimusaiheisiin liittyvät keskustelut

Valvoja: Hallitus

Carbonautti
Viestit: 544
Liittynyt: 01.09.2015, 19:59:12

#DataGate

Viesti Kirjoittaja Carbonautti » 07.10.2018, 21:06:07

JoNova-sivustolla on kerrotaan uudesta #DataGatesta. Se tarkoittaa huonolaatuista lämpötiladataa (HadCRUT4 dataset), johon ilmastomallit perustuvat:
#DataGate! First ever audit of global temperature data finds freezing tropical islands, boiling towns, boats on land

John McLean kertoo löydöistään näin:
It seems like neither organization properly checked the land or sea temperature data before using it in the HadCRUT4 dataset. If it had been checked then the CRU might have queried the more obvious errors in data supplied by different countries. The Hadley Centre might also have found some of the inconsistencies in the sea surface temperature data, along with errors that it created itself when it copied data from the hand-written logs of some Royal Navy ships.

Hätkähdyttävimmät virheet, mitä datasta on löydetty:
Gory details of the worst outliers:
* For April, June and July of 1978 Apto Uto (Colombia, ID:800890) had an average monthly temperature of 81.5°C, 83.4°C and 83.4°C respectively.
* The monthly mean temperature in September 1953 at Paltinis, Romania is reported as -46.4 °C (in other years the September average was about 11.5°C).
* At Golden Rock Airport, on the island of St Kitts in the Caribbean, mean monthly temperatures for December in 1981 and 1984 are reported as 0.0°C. But from 1971 to 1990 the average in all the other years was 26.0°C.

Linkki:
http://joannenova.com.au/2018/10/first-audit-of-global-temperature-data-finds-freezing-tropical-islands-boiling-towns-boats-on-land/

nokikolari
Viestit: 72
Liittynyt: 15.09.2010, 18:00:32

Re: #DataGate

Viesti Kirjoittaja nokikolari » 08.10.2018, 13:14:44

Tässä samasta asiasta:

https://www.breitbart.com/big-governmen ... able-data/

Samassa jutussa siitä konsensuksesta: "But in fact the number of scientists involved in the key Chapter 9 – the one which reached the headline conclusion that human-induced warming was detectable in every continent except Antarctica, and that this was leading to all manner of disasters from melting glaciers and sea ice to changing rainfall patterns and more intense cyclone activity – was just 53."

Carbonautti
Viestit: 544
Liittynyt: 01.09.2015, 19:59:12

Re: #DataGate

Viesti Kirjoittaja Carbonautti » 10.10.2018, 10:46:40

nokikolari kirjoitti:Tässä samasta asiasta:

https://www.breitbart.com/big-governmen ... able-data/

Samassa jutussa siitä konsensuksesta: "But in fact the number of scientists involved in the key Chapter 9 – the one which reached the headline conclusion that human-induced warming was detectable in every continent except Antarctica, and that this was leading to all manner of disasters from melting glaciers and sea ice to changing rainfall patterns and more intense cyclone activity – was just 53."

Kanadalainen toimittaja Donna Laframboise on kirjoittanut IPCC:n tavasta siirtää tieteilijät sivuun, kun ilmastoraportteja laaditaan poliitikkojen ja byrokraattien kesken. Artikkelin nimi on "3 Things Scientists Need to Know About the IPCC". Kannattaa lukea.

Linkki:
https://nofrakkingconsensus.com/2015/09/01/3-things-scientists-need-to-know-about-the-ipcc/

nokikolari
Viestit: 72
Liittynyt: 15.09.2010, 18:00:32

Re: #DataGate

Viesti Kirjoittaja nokikolari » 10.10.2018, 11:51:33

Uskomantonta :cry:

Vastaa Viestiin